The impeachment pretrial of Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte is nearing completion after stretching into a fifth day, as her defense team and House prosecutors moved to finalize the painstaking marking of thousands of pages of documentary evidence. The pretrial conference, which began on June 18, has focused on organizing and pre-marking evidence, identifying witnesses, and stipulating uncontested facts ahead of the full impeachment trial.

Defense lawyer and spokesperson Michael Poa said on Thursday he was "very optimistic" the pretrial could be finished by the end of the day, citing faster progress in recent sessions. Poa told reporters that at his own marking station he expected to complete work by around 3 p.m. or 4 p.m., and that other members of the defense team handling separate batches of documents shared a similarly optimistic outlook. He added that if the process needed more time, an extension into Friday would likely be the latest.

The bulk of the work has centered on Article I of the impeachment complaint, which concerns Duterte's alleged misuse of confidential funds and alone involves about 8,000 documents to be marked, according to Senate clerk of court Renato Bantug. Four mixed teams composed of prosecution and defense members, along with staff from the Office of the Senate Secretary acting as the clerk of court, have been assigned to handle the Article I materials, while two additional teams are processing evidence for Article II, which deals with Duterte's supposed unexplained wealth.

Earlier in the pretrial, both sides completed pre-marking evidence for Articles III and IV. Those articles include allegations that Duterte bribed officials of the Department of Education and accusations connected to purported threats against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Marcos, and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez, which are framed in the complaint as bribery, corruption, and culpable violation of the Constitution, high crimes, and betrayal of public trust. The conference had initially been expected to conclude on its second day, but the volume of documents forced an extension to the scheduled fifth day, with additional teams deployed and working hours stretched in recent sessions to hasten the process.

A 45-year-old Western restaurant in Hong Kong’s Fanling district is set to close at the end of this month, after failing to absorb a steep rent increase. Yat Sizz Restaurant, a nostalgia-steeped eatery on Wo Fung Street in Luen Wo Hui, will serve its last customers on July 31, staff confirmed in local media reports. Employees said the landlord raised the rent to a level the business could no longer afford, adding the owner "might have thought the Yat Sizz name could carry it." Attempts to negotiate reportedly fell through.

Opened in the early 1980s, Yat Sizz has long been regarded as a local landmark. The restaurant has kept its original interior largely intact, featuring white walls framed by multiple arched doorways, wood floors, black wrought-iron railings and a red-brick English-style bar. The highly distinctive décor has drawn comparisons with Amigo, a high-end French restaurant in Happy Valley, earning Yat Sizz the nickname "Fanling Amigo" and a listing on the Hong Kong Tourism Board’s website.

The menu leans heavily on classic Western fare that was once a staple of old Hong Kong dining rooms: borscht, French escargots, American Angus steaks, deep-fried prawn cutlets and seafood baked under puff pastry, alongside pasta dishes such as spicy garlic prawn angel hair. In its earlier years, the restaurant attracted foreign patrons from nearby British army barracks as well as visitors from other parts of the city who sought out its retro atmosphere and traditional dishes.

News of the impending closure circulated recently on social media, triggering a wave of nostalgic comments from long-time customers who said they were saddened by the development. Many described Yat Sizz as part of the collective memory of North District residents and a defining feature of Luen Wo Hui’s streetscape. With the rent dispute unresolved and the last day of service now set, the venue is poised to become the latest long-established neighborhood business in Hong Kong to disappear, leaving regulars to remember it as a symbol of a fading era of local dining culture.